Theory of Change

Connect what you do to the change you want to see.

A Theory of Change is a logic model that makes your impact strategy explicit — tracing the chain from resources and activities through to outputs, outcomes, and the long-term change you're working toward. It forces you to surface the assumptions that hold your model together. Used in social enterprise, philanthropy, and systems change work, it's equally powerful for any venture trying to be clear about how and why its activities produce results in the world.

Download / Print PDF Try it in The Studio → Learn more about this tool →

How to run this

  1. Start with Impact: define the long-term change you want to see in the world.
  2. Work backwards: what outcomes lead to that impact? What outputs produce those outcomes?
  3. Map your activities — the work you actually do — and the inputs that enable them.
  4. Surface assumptions: what must be true at each step for the chain to hold?
  5. Test the chain: could a sceptic break any link? Where is your evidence weakest?

Theory of Change

Carol Weiss · 1995 · W.K. Kellogg Foundation Logic Model · adapted for ventures
The Studio · Wade Institute of Entrepreneurship
Inputs
Activities  →
Outputs  →
Outcomes  →
Impact
① INPUTS
Resources
What do you invest? Money, people, time, expertise, partnerships, infrastructure.
② ACTIVITIES
What You Do
The programmes, services, and work you actually deliver. What are you doing?
③ OUTPUTS
Direct Results
The measurable, direct products of your activities. Units, people reached, content produced.
④ OUTCOMES
Changes in People
What changes for participants — in knowledge, behaviour, skills, status, or circumstances?
⑤ IMPACT
Long-Term Change
The sustained change in conditions, systems, or society that your work contributes to over years.
ASSUMPTION A
Inputs → Activities
What must be true for your resources to enable your activities?
ASSUMPTION B
Activities → Outputs
What must be true for your activities to produce these outputs?
ASSUMPTION C
Outputs → Outcomes
What must be true for outputs to produce meaningful change in people?
ASSUMPTION D
Outcomes → Impact
What must be true for individual change to add up to systemic impact?
Common mistake

Confusing outputs with outcomes. Outputs are what you produce — outcomes are what changes. "100 people trained" is an output; "graduates earning 30% more" is an outcome.

What good looks like

Each assumption is explicitly named and testable — not just implied. The weakest assumption is the highest-priority thing to validate before scaling.

When to move on

When you can trace a clear causal chain from your resources to your impact statement, and name the evidence you'd need to prove each link.

Try it interactively with WAiDE

WAiDE will help you trace the logic chain from your inputs to your impact and surface the assumptions holding your model together. You'll leave with a theory of change and a session report.

Start Theory of Change with WAiDE →

More canvases

Browse all 24 canvases →